DISMISSALS
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
“Unfortunately, we’ve […] seen a historic rise in the distribution of child pornography, in the number of images being shared online, and in the level of violence associated with child exploitation and sexual abuse crimes. Tragically, the only place we’ve seen a decrease is in the age of victims. This is – quite simply – unacceptable.”
The quote above is of the top lawyer in the country, Attorney General Eric Holder Jr., who spoke at the National Strategy Conference on Combating Child Exploitation in 2011. In general, Holder is right when it comes to child exploitation. We should do what we can to prevent harm from coming to children.
At the same time, though, rarely do we see quotes or stories about the other side of the coin, the people who are put in the crosshairs of the federal government, the people whose lives are turned upside down when federal agents come marching through the door in full battle dress.
You might be someone’s brother or sister, mom or dad, husband or wife. Or you are the person who has been accused. Whether it’s you or you’re a family member or loved one, your worry and anxiety is at an all-time high, and for good reason.
These cases start when the federal government works to entrap people – though they wouldn’t call it that – into revealing the possibility that they might be searching for or dealing in child pornography. With enough evidence of that sort, agents will seek a search warrant from a judge. With search warrant in hand, agents – as well as a SWAT team in many cases – will storm the castle, march into your home and seize your computer.
From there, it’s a matter of searching all your private files and web history, which may or may not be enough to prove that you’re guilty of a crime. Next are the arrest and the criminal charges, very often with no evidence that the person accused posed any sort of danger to society.
So, here are the big questions:
This article is my attempt to answer these questions. I don’t presume to be the final word here, but as a contributing author of Strategies for Defending Internet Pornography Cases , I do understand what it means to face down the government in cases that involve electronic documents and technological evidence. Most importantly, I believe that to be charged with a child pornography offense is one of the worst things that can happen to someone.
It’s a situation that deserves the most aggressive defense.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Put our team of criminal defense lawyers on your side today. You are one phone call or email away from getting your questions answered by an experienced defense attorney.
Call us at 919-838-6643to set up a free consultation or send us an email.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 919-838-6643 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2024 Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy |