DISMISSALS
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
No. The Fifth Amendment provides you with a privilege against self-incrimination. You cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself. This means that you do not have to answer the questions of police if they tend to show your involvement in criminal activity. If you are being investigated, questioned or are under arrest, you should request a lawyer and otherwise keep quiet.
If you are under arrest, you should have been read your Miranda rights, informing you that you have the right to remain silent, among other rights. If you have not been arrested but are in police or federal custody and are not free to leave, you should also have been read your Miranda rights.
If you choose to remain silent, your silence cannot be used against you. If you do not choose to remain silent, anything you say may be used against you.
Strange as it sounds, you must invoke your right to remain silent by telling the police that you are choosing to remain silent. You must speak in order to assert your right to remain silent.
Expert Tip: If a person is both (1) in custody, and (2) interrogated by law enforcement, then any answers to police questions given by that person, without prior administration of the Miranda warnings, are inadmissible at trial. Often, particularly in the case of child pornography investigations, law enforcement officers interview suspects while executing a search warrant of the suspect’s home without advising that suspect of the Miranda warnings. If the suspect gives incriminating answers to law enforcement questions, the issue becomes whether the suspect was “in custody.” If the circumstances of the police interview were coercive, an experienced criminal defense attorney can argue that the suspect was in custody, and that the statements he or she made should be excluded from the trial as violations of Miranda. See United States v. Hashime, 734 F.3d. 278 (4 th Cir. 2013) (child pornography convictions reversed where statements made by the defendant during a search of his residence were obtained in violation of Miranda).
A common trap used by police during a traffic stop is asking the driver if you know why you were pulled over. Answering the officer’s question will likely incriminate you. “Yes officer, I was speeding,” or “I didn’t come to a complete stop at that sign” are admissions of guilt that can be used against you.
Important: If you are innocent, if you have been falsely accused, or even if you did commit the offense you are charged with, asserting your right to remain silent followed by your right to talk to an attorney is the best strategy to take to protect your future.
Even if you think it’s a good idea to waive your Miranda rights and tell the police everything you know, it’s a better idea to talk to an attorney first. Federal defense attorneys at Marcilliat & Mills PLLC are available at 919-838-6643. You may also contact us by email. Marcilliat & Mills PLLC is based in Raleigh, North Carolina.
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
State v. B.S. – First Degree Murder
State v. E.D. – Identity Theft
State v. J.A. – First Degree Rape
Each case is different and must be evaluated on its individual facts. We work hard to assess each case individually. Prior results do not guarantee any future outcome.
Put our team of criminal defense lawyers on your side today. You are one phone call or email away from getting your questions answered by an experienced defense attorney.
Call us at 919-838-6643to set up a free consultation or send us an email.
Fields marked with an * are required
Call 919-838-6643 to schedule a free initial consultation. Offices open weekdays 8am – 7pm, Saturdays 9am – 5pm
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories — legal ability and general ethical standards.
© 2024 Marcilliat & Mills PLLC. All Rights Reserved.
Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy |